
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 16:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: luiz.maurer@enron.com
To: joao.albuquerque@enron.com
Subject: Re: CAP no MAE
Cc: orlando.gonzalez@enron.com, sergio.assad@enron.com, fred.sampaio@enron.com,
britaldo.soares@enron.com, brett.wiggs@enron.com,
remi.collonges@enron.com, david.rosenberg@enron.com
Bcc: orlando.gonzalez@enron.com, sergio.assad@enron.com, fred.sampaio@enron.com,
britaldo.soares@enron.com, brett.wiggs@enron.com,
remi.collonges@enron.com, david.rosenberg@enron.com

I strongly disagree

"If it is impossible to reach an agreement within ABRADEE",, then we should
be loud an clear in expressing our own view, to all levels of government
including a position paper to  Pedro Parente asap.  Caps at this point in
time may jeopardize the rationing plan per se. We had a victory in anchoring
the penalties to the MAE price. Why surrender it now?

Why do we have to abide by ABRADEE's desires?

This is not a religious issue only.  There are a few US$ million left on the
table.

How many US$ million are on the table for Enron?

