
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 02:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: robert.williams@enron.com
To: harry.kingerski@enron.com, wanda.curry@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com,
mday@gmssr.com
Subject: RE: ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE - CPUC Decision
Cc: james.steffes@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com
Bcc: james.steffes@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com

I would also consider letting Jeff know the following:  1.  We have pending a
complaint against SCE at the PUC to compel SCE to pay the negative CTCs to
us.  ALJ and Commissioner for Complaint are same ALJ/Comm. proposing this
treatment.  So no chance of different outcome there.  2.  SCE should drop its
"affiliate market abuse" counterclaim that it filed in that proceeding.  3.
Proposed order also implies that no cash payment--only bill credit--will be
recognized for negative CTC.  [no suggesting mentioning this to Bryson].  4.
Mike Day raised another alternative which would be that, for now, just get
SCE to support "bifurcation" and deferral of negative CTC issue and then
enter negotiations on payment afterwards.

