
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 04:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: marcus.nettelton@enron.com
To: chris.walker@enron.com
Subject: RE: FW: Super Peak loadshape language
Cc: elizabeth.sager@enron.com, peter.makkai@enron.com
Bcc: elizabeth.sager@enron.com, peter.makkai@enron.com

Chris
=20
Further to our conversation, hopefully this language describes the scheduli=
ng=20
aspect of the product as required. If not, please do not hesitate to call m=
e.
Please check again to see that the requirement is that the scheduling must=
=20
take place on the Weekday before and only on that date. This does appear to=
=20
be inflexible, I would prefer that the parties have the flexibility to=20
schedule earlier if they elect to do so.
=20
Regards,
=20
Marcus

"Firm energy shall, unless otherwise agreed, be scheduled on the Weekday=20
before the next Delivery Day. "Weekday" means a day during the term of the=
=20
transaction that is a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, or Friday,=20
excluding any day that is a NERC holiday"
a day during the term of the transaction that is a Monday, Tuesday,=20
Wednesday, Thursday, or Friday, excluding any day that is a NERC holiday.=
=20

=20





=09Chris Walker/ENRON@enronXgate
=0905/16/2001 11:03 AM
=09=09=20
=09=09 To: Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON
=09=09 cc: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Makkai/NA/Enron@Enron
=09=09 Subject: RE: FW: Super Peak loadshape language

Thanks Marcus, I apologize for all the emails.  Could we change to the=20
following as noted below? =20

"Firm energy shall, unless otherwise agreed, be scheduled on the weekday=20
before the next Delivery Day."=20
CW

