
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 02:39:00 -0800 (PST)
From: elizabeth.sager@enron.com
To: leslie.hansen@enron.com, david.portz@enron.com, janet.moore@enron.com,
christian.yoder@enron.com, genia.fitzgerald@enron.com,
jeffrey.hodge@enron.com
Subject: EEI Draft- historical data for future use in the battle of the
confirmation process

A huge debate has been ongoing in he battle whether to include language in
the EEI Contract that would provide that a confirmation that contains
"substantive" terms not discussed by the traders is subject to the "deemed
accepted" language.  I have been very vocal against  adding this language.
The politics as you can tell from this email have been fierce, and as in much
of successful politics, dirty.  I'm not sure where this will end up, but feel
like it is important that we all are aware of the history here as well as
Enron's position (Confirmation needs to be the final, best evidence unless
objected to in a timely manner). I will keep everybody posted on the results
of the vote.
